Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(6): 1161-1166, Nov.-Dec. 2019. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1056350

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare two-shift operation mode and single player mode different impact on surgical results and operator comfort in flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for renal calculi larger than 1.5cm. Materials and Methods: From december 2017 to december 2018, 92 patients with renal calculi admitted to Qilu Hospital and were treated through flexible ureteroscopy. They were randomized in two-shift group (n=50) and single player group (n=42). The operative time, blood loss, hospitalization stay after operation, residual fragments (≥4mm) rate, fragmentation speed, postoperative complications and operator's fatigue score were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between two groups regarding age, gender, illness side, stone size, blood loss, operative time, postoperative hospitalization stay, complications, etc (p >0.05). The fragmentation speed was 44.5±20.0mm3/min in two-shift group compared with 34.2±17.3mm3/min in single player group (p=0.037). Residual fragments (≥4mm) rate after first surgery was 18% in two-shift group, while the residual fragments (≥4mm) rate was 40.5% after first surgery in single player group (p=0.017). The total fatigue score of two-shift group was 8.4 compared to 29.9 in single player group (p <0.001). Conclusion: In flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for the treatment of renal calculi larger than 1.5cm, two-shift operation mode can raise the fragmentation speed and stone clearance rate, as well as significantly lower operator's fatigue level and improve operator's comfort.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Lithotripsy, Laser/methods , Ureteroscopy/methods , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications , Kidney Calculi/pathology , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Lithotripsy, Laser/instrumentation , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Operative Time , Ergonomics , Length of Stay , Middle Aged
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(4): 658-670, July-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1019879

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose to critically review all literature concerning the cost-effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy comparing single-use with reusable scopes. Materials and Methods A systematic online literature review was performed in PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases. All factors potentially affecting surgical costs or clinical outcomes were considered. Prospective assessments, case control and case series studies were included. Results 741 studies were found. Of those, 18 were duplicated and 77 were not related to urology procedures. Of the remaining 646 studies, 59 were considered of relevance and selected for further analysis. Stone free and complication rates were similar between single-use and reusable scopes. Operative time was in average 20% shorter with digital scopes, single-use or not. Reusable digital scopes seem to last longer than optic ones, though scope longevity is very variable worldwide. New scopes usually last four times more than refurbished ones and single-use ureterorenoscopes have good resilience throughout long cases. Longer scope longevity is achieved with Cidex and if a dedicated nurse takes care of the sterilization process. The main surgical factors that negatively impact device longevity are lower pole pathologies, large stone burden and non-use of a ureteral access sheath. We have built a comprehensive financial cost-effective decision model to flexible ureteroscope acquisition. Conclusions The cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program is dependent of several aspects. We have developed a equation to allow a literature-based and adaptable decision model to every interested stakeholder. Disposable devices are already a reality and will progressively become the standard as manufacturing price falls.


Subject(s)
Humans , Equipment Reuse/economics , Ureteroscopy/economics , Ureteroscopes/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Equipment Reuse/statistics & numerical data , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Ureteroscopy/statistics & numerical data , Ureteroscopes/standards , Ureteroscopes/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Design , Operative Time
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(3): 524-535, May-June 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-954034

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) facilitate flexible ureteroscopy in the treat- ment of urolithiasis. The physical properties of UAS vary by manufacturer and model. We compared three new UAS: Glideway (GW, Terumo, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr), Pathway (PW, Terumo 12/14F) and Navigator HD (NHD, Boston Scientific, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr) in the domains of safety characteristics, positioning characteristics, lubricity and radio- opacity. Materials and Methods: In vitro testing of the three UAS included safety testing-tip perforation force, sheath edge deformation and dilator extraction forces. Positioning characteristics tested included tip bending, stiffness (resistance to coaxial buckling forces), kinking (resistance to perpendicular forces), and insertion forces. Lubricity was assessed by measured frictional forces of the outer sheath. Finally, radio-opacity was tested utilizing fluoroscopic imaging of the three 12F sheaths and inner dilators. Results: The PW (0.245 lb) and GW (0.286 lb) required less force for tip perforation compared to the NHD (0.628 lb). The NHD sheath edge deformation was mild compared to more severe deformation for the PW and GW. The PW (1.008 lb) required greater force than the GW (0.136 lb) and NHD (0.043 lb) for inner dilator removal. The GW (3.69 lbs) and NHD (4.17 lb) had similar inner dilator tip stiffness when bent, while the PW had the weakest inner dilator tip, 1.91 lbs. The PW (0.271 lb) was most susceptible to buckling and kinking (1.626 lb). The most lubricious UAS was the NHD (0.055 lbs for 12F). The NHD (0.277 lbs) required the least insertional force through a biological model and possessed the greatest radio-opacity. Conclusions: Comparison of different commercially available UAS in various sizes reveals that there are mechanical differences in sheaths that may play a role clinically. The Terumo sheaths' (GW and PW) were outperformed by the Boston Scientific NHD in simulating safety, ease of use and radio-opacity.


Subject(s)
Animals , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Reference Values , Swine , Ureter/surgery , Materials Testing , Analysis of Variance , Friction , Ureteroscopy/methods , Ureteroscopes , Dilatation/instrumentation , Lubrication
4.
Acta cir. bras ; 33(5): 408-414, May 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-949346

ABSTRACT

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the clinical stenosis or precursor histological changes that ureteral access sheaths commonly used in ureteroscopic surgeries may cause in the long term in ureter. Methods: In this study, the animals were divided into 9 groups and according to their groups, ureters of the rabbits were endoscopically fitted with 2F and 3F ureter catheters. The catheters were left in place and withdrawn after a specified period of time. All the ureters were excised and evaluated macroscopically, microscopically and histologically. Ureter diameters were measured and FGF-2 (+) labeled fibroblasts were counted in connective tissue as stenosis precursors. Results: Macroscopically or microscopically, no stenosis was found in any group. The ureter diameter of the group that were catheterized for the longest time with the catheter that had the widest diameter was significantly lower than the group with the shorter duration and the catheter with the narrower diameter and the control group. When the groups were compared in terms of their FGF values, there was a significant difference in FGF-2 counts at all three ureter levels (p <0.05). Conclusion: The use of ureteral access sheath may lead to histological changes, as its diameter and duration increase.


Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Rats , Ureter/surgery , Urologic Diseases/surgery , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Ureter/pathology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Disease Models, Animal
5.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 63(8): 717-721, Aug. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-896384

ABSTRACT

Summary Introduction: It is generally advised to have a safety guidewire (SGW) present during ureteroscopy (URS) to manage possible complications. However, it increases the strenght needed to insert and retract the endoscope during the procedure, and, currently, there is a lack of solid data supporting the need for SGW in all procedures. We reviewed the literature about SGW utilization during URS. Method: A review of the literature was conducted through April 2017 using PubMed, Ovid, and The Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies. The primary outcome was to report stone-free rates, feasibility, contraindications to and complications of performing intrarenal retrograde flexible and semi-rigid URS without the use of a SGW. Results: Six studies were identified and selected for this review, and overall they included 1,886 patients where either semi-rigid or flexible URS was performed without the use of a SGW for the treatment of urinary calculi disease. Only one study reported stone-free rates with or without SGW at 77.1 and 85.9%, respectively (p=0.001). None of the studies showed increased rates of complications in the absence of SGW and one of them showed more post-endoscopic ureteral stenosis whenever SGW was routinely used. All studies recommended utilization of SGW in complicated cases, such as ureteral stones associated with significant edema, ureteral stricture, abnormal anatomy or difficult visualization. Conclusion: Our review showed a lack of relevant data supporting the use of SGW during retrograde URS. A well-designed prospective randomized trial is in order.


Resumo Introdução: O uso de fio guia de segurança (FGS) costuma ser recomendado para a realização de ureteroscopia para prevenir e solucionar complicações durante o procedimento. Seu uso, porém, aumenta a força necessária para manipular o aparelho endoscópico dentro da luz ureteral e, atualmente, existe uma carência de dados consistentes que indiquem o uso do FGS em todos os procedimentos. Método: Uma revisão da literatura foi realizada em abril de 2017 utilizando as ferramentas PubMed, Ovid e The Cochrane Library para identificar estudos relevantes. O desfecho primário da análise foi reportar taxas de resolução dos cálculos, viabilidade, contraindicações e complicações relacionadas ao não uso do FGS. Resultados: Seis estudos foram incluídos na análise, totalizando 1.886 pacientes, nos quais foi realizada ureteroscopia semirrígida ou flexível sem o uso do FGS no tratamento de cálculos renais ou ureterais. Somente um estudo relatou taxa livre de cálculos com ou sem FGS, sendo 77,1 e 85,9%, respectivamente (p=0.001). Todos os estudos mostraram não haver aumento da taxa de complicação na ausência do FGS e um deles relatou aumento de estenose ureteral pós-endoscopia no grupo que utilizou o FGS. Todos os estudos recomendam o uso do FGS em casos complicados, como cálculos ureterais associados a edema de mucosa, estenose ureteral, anomalias anatômicas ou dificuldade de visualização do cálculo. Conclusão: Nossa revisão mostrou que faltam dados relevantes para justificar o uso do FGS durante a ureteroscopia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Ureteroscopy/adverse effects , Ureteroscopy/methods
6.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 43(3): 476-480, May.-June 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-840854

ABSTRACT

Introduction The Spies™ system (Karl-Storz®) was introduced into digital ureteroscopy to improve endoscopic vision. To date, there is no data to either indicate which of the Spies modalities is better for improving diagnosis and treatment procedures, nor to compare the modalities in terms of image quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the image quality of five Spies™ modalities (SM) to the standard white light in an in-vitro model. Materials and Methods Two standardized grids and 3 stones of different composition were recorded in white light and the 5SM (Clara, Chroma, Clara+Chroma), Spectra A and B) using 4 standardized aqueous scenarios. Twelve templates were done in order to simultaneously compare the same objective in the different modalities. Six urologists, five medical students, five urology residents, and five persons not involved with urology evaluated each video on a scale of 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good). Results Comparing white light to SM, subjects scored better the quality of Clara and Clara+Chroma than white light (p=0.0139 and p<0.05) and scored worse Spectra A and B (p=0.0005 and p=0.0023)). When comparing Clara to the other SM, it was ranked equivalent to Clara+Chroma (p=0.67) and obtained a higher rank than Chroma, Spectra A and B (p<0.05, p=0.0001 and p=0.0001). In the multivariate analysis mean scores were higher among urologists. Conclusion In all analyzed scenarios, the subjects ranked Clara and Clara+Chroma as the modalities with better image quality compared to white light.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Urologic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lithotripsy, Laser , Ureteroscopy/methods , Ureteroscopes , Middle Aged
7.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(5): 967-972, Sept.-Oct. 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-796892

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: We analyzed the outcome and complications of rigid (R-URS) and flexible (F-URS) ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treatment of proximal ureteric stone (PUS). Subjects and methods: Retrospective data of 135 patients (93 males and 42 females) submitted to R-URS and F-URS for treatment of PUS in the period between July 2013 and January 2015 were investigated. (R-URS, group 1) was performed in 72 patients while 63 patients underwent (F-URS, group 2).We compared the 2 groups for success, stone characteristics, operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results: The overall stone free rate (SFRs) was 49/72 (68%) in group 1 and 57/63 (91%) patients in group 2, (P=0.005). The operative time was shorter in group 1 in comparison to group 2 with statistically significant difference (P=0.005). There was not any statistically significant difference between 2 groups in complication rate (P=0.2). Conclusıon: Both R-URS and F-URS could be a feasible option for treatment of PUS. R-URS is less successful for treatment of PUS and should be used cautiously and with availability of F-URS.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Lithotripsy/methods , Ureteral Calculi/therapy , Ureteroscopy/methods , Postoperative Complications , Lithotripsy/adverse effects , Lithotripsy/instrumentation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Ureteroscopy/adverse effects , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Disease-Free Survival , Operative Time , Intraoperative Complications , Length of Stay , Middle Aged
8.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(3): 479-486, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-785743

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes and the complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones in a multi-institutional working group. Materials and Methods From 2012 to 2014, we conducted a prospective study including all RIRS performed for kidney stones in 4 European centers. Demographic information, disease characteristics, and perioperative and postoperative data were gathered. Patients and stone data, procedure characteristics, results and safety outcomes were analyzed and compared by descriptive statistics. Complications were reported using the standardized Clavien system. Results Three hundred and fifty-six patients underwent 377 RIRS with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones. The RIRS was completed in all patients with a mean operative time of 63.5 min. The stone-free status was confirmed endoscopically and through fluoroscopic imaging after the first procedure in 73.6%. The second procedure was performed in twenty patients (5.6%) achieving an overall stone free rate of 78.9%. The overall complication rate was 15.1%. Intra-operative and post-operative complications were seen in 24 (6.7%) and 30 (8.4%) cases, respectively. Conclusions RIRS is a minimally invasive procedure with good results in terms of stone-free and complications rate.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Lithotripsy, Laser/methods , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Ureteroscopy/methods , Ureteroscopes , Postoperative Complications , Fluoroscopy/methods , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Lithotripsy, Laser/instrumentation , Ureteroscopy/adverse effects , Equipment Design , Europe , Operative Time , Length of Stay , Middle Aged
9.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(4): 683-689, July-Aug. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-763067

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACTPurpose:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of flexible ureteroscope (F-URS) combined with holmium laser lithotripter in treating renal calculi in horseshoe kidney.Materials and Methods:From November 2010 to December 2013, the medical history and charts of sixteen patients (mean age 42.9±11.6 years, range 26-66 years), including 13 males and 3 females were analyzed retrospectively. Mean stone burden was 29±8 mm (range 17-42 mm2). Mean stone digitized surface area (DSA) was 321±94 mm2 (range 180-538 mm2). Under spinal anesthesia in a modified lithotomy position with the head down, rigid ureteroscope was placed firstly into the ureter to reach the level of the pelvis, a zebra guide wire was inserted and following the removal of the rigid ureteroscope, an ureteral access sheath was positioned along the guide wire, then passed the URF P-5 flexible ureteroscope into the renal cavities over the guidewire. After locating the stones, holmium laser lithotripsy was performed.Results:The average operative time was 92±16 minutes (range 74-127 min.). No major complications were encountered. Ten patients obtained stone-free status with one session, four obtained stone-free status after two sessions. Single session stone-free rate was 62.5%, overall stone-free rate was 87.5%. Two patients have small residual stones in the lower pole.Conclusions:F-URS combined with holmium laser lithotripter and nitinol basket, is safe and effective in dealing with moderate stone diameter (<30 mm) in HSKs with high clearance rates and low complication rates.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Fused Kidney/complications , Kidney Calculi/therapy , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Disease Management , Kidney Calculi/complications , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Lithotripsy, Laser/classification , Lithotripsy, Laser , Operative Time , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Ureteroscopes
10.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(6): 842-845, Nov-Dec/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-735991

ABSTRACT

Purpose We tested a new head-mounted display (HMD) system for surgery on the upper urinary tract. Surgical Technique Four women and one man with abnormal findings in the renal pelvis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging underwent surgery using this new system. A high definition HMD (Sony, Tokyo, Japan) is connected to a flexible ureteroscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and the images from the ureteroscope are delivered simultaneously to various participants wearing HMDs. Furthermore, various information in addition to that available through the endoscope, such as the narrow band image, the fluoroscope, input from a video camera mounted on the lead surgeon’s HMD and the vital monitors can be viewed on each HMD. Results Median operative duration and anesthesia time were 53 and 111 minutes, respectively. The ureteroscopic procedures were successfully performed in all cases. There were no notable negative outcomes or incidents (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥1). Conclusion The HMD system offers simultaneous, high-quality magnified imagery in front of the eyes, regardless of head position, to those participating in the endoscopic procedures. This affordable display system also provides various forms of information related to examinations and operations while allowing direct vision and navigated vision. .


Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Carcinoma/surgery , Ureteroscopes , Ureteroscopy/methods , Urologic Neoplasms/surgery , Video-Assisted Surgery/methods , Biopsy , Carcinoma/pathology , Equipment Design , Operative Time , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Urinary Tract/surgery , Urologic Neoplasms/pathology , Video-Assisted Surgery/instrumentation
12.
Minoufia Medical Journal. 2005; 18 (2): 71-76
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-73657

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the feasibility of the ureteroscope versus the use of cystoscope to introduce the ureteric guide wire. This study was conducted on 50 patients [100 units]. They were divided into two groups, group A [50 units] with normal ureters in one side as seen in IVU and group B [50 units] with pathology either stricture or stone ureter in the other side. After initial cystoscopic evaluation and identification of both ureteric orifices, the cystoscope and/or ureteroscope were used to introduce the guide wire in group A ureteroscopy was successful in 100% of the cases [25 units] as initial tool, while with the use of the cystoscope it is only 76% [18 out of 25] which increased to 96% after the use of ureteroscope to introduce the guide wire. In group B with the use of ureteroscope in 25 pathological ureters, it is successful in 92% of the cases [23/ 25] while with the use of cystoscope it is only 60% [15/ 25]. With the aid of the ureterpscope in the remaining failed cases the success rate was increased to 80% [20/25] and complete failure in 5 cases due to massive trauma to the ureter from multiple trials of blind introduction of the guide wire through the cystoscope. Introduction of the ureteric guide wire is essential step in ureteroscopy as with its failure all the procedure will fail. So, simple and easy introduction of the guide wire through the cystoscope was tried first, if failed, multiple trials is not recommended and it is better to use the ureteroscope to introduce it under vision better than blind trials avoiding trauma to the ureter


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Ureteroscopy/adverse effects , Cystoscopy/adverse effects , Cystoscopy/instrumentation , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Comparative Study , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects
13.
Kasr El-Aini Medical Journal. 2003; 9 (5 Supp.): 107-110
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-124145

ABSTRACT

Aim of work to evaluate the role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy in management of lower third ureteric calculi. 60 patient with symptomatic distal ureteric calculi, with age range from 20-54y. [average 36y] were divided into 2 groups. Group 1, 30 patients with average stone size 8mm had ESWL monotherapy for management of their stones with Siemens lithoster plus lithotripor. Group 2, 30 patients with average stone size 10 m.m had ureteroscopy with stone extraction with or without disintigration done for their stones as management. Results Group I: 26 patients [86.6%] became stone free, retreatment rate was [34.5%]. Group2: 29 patients [96.6%] became stone free with no retreatments ureterescopy remains the gold standard treatment for distal ureteric calculi. ESWL might be considered in stones

Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Lithotripsy/statistics & numerical data , Comparative Study , Treatment Outcome
14.
Benha Medical Journal. 2001; 18 (1): 181-189
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-56367

ABSTRACT

During the period between July 1995 and January 1998, fifty patients with upper 2/3 ureteric calculi were subjected to endourological procedures using retrograde stone displacement or flushing back to the kidney. All patients were subjected to either PCNL for cases with successful retrograde flushing technique or PCN and antegrade renoureteroscopy for cases with failed retrograde flushing and in whom flushing was not attempted because of non visualized ureteric orifice. Thirty seven patients were male [74%] and thirteen were females [26%] with an average age of 41 years. The stones were located in the upper 1/3 ureter in 40 patients [80%] middle 1/3 in 9 patients [18%] and in both thirds in one patient [2%]. In seven patients ureteral stones were associated with renal stones which were removed during the same sitting. The overall stone clearance was 92%. The intra and post-operative complications were minimal. The operative time averaged 105 minutes for push and pull procedures and 120 min. for antegrade renoureteroscopy. Hospital stay for the successful cases ranged from 3-8 days with an average of 4 days


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Ureteroscopy/instrumentation , Length of Stay , Postoperative Complications , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL